Discussion:
[Sqlgrey-users] Stable tree or experimental?
McDonald, Dan
2007-05-24 20:01:19 UTC
Permalink
I've been running sqlgrey 1.6.6 for a while, and am comfortable with how
it works. One of my spam-tossers lost a disk, and I am rebuilding the
system from scratch (It's been in operation basically unchanged for a
year - with this sort of application it's good to get a nice clean slate
now and again). Should I stick with 1.6.6 or go with the latest
experimental release? (1.7.5?)
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX
Austin Energy
http://www.austinenergy.com
Lionel Bouton
2007-05-24 20:27:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by McDonald, Dan
I've been running sqlgrey 1.6.6 for a while, and am comfortable with how
it works. One of my spam-tossers lost a disk, and I am rebuilding the
system from scratch (It's been in operation basically unchanged for a
year - with this sort of application it's good to get a nice clean slate
now and again). Should I stick with 1.6.6 or go with the latest
experimental release? (1.7.5?)
Currently the experimental has one less known bug than the stable (if
syslog dies, SQLgrey can die too).

Lionel

Loading...